This article explores a proposal by MP Tan Wu Meng to consider caning for scam-related offenses, prompted by rising scam cases in Singapore:
Clik here to view.

- Scale of the problem:
- Scam victims in Singapore lost $1.1 billion in 2024 alone
- Total losses exceed $3.4 billion since 2019
- More than 33,000 money mules and scammers were investigated between 2021-2024
- Current situation:
- Money mules can be charged under existing laws but don’t face caning
- Current penalties include fines up to $250,000 and jail terms up to 5 years
- Recent sentencing guidelines recommend jail terms of at least 6 months for money mules
- Arguments for caning:
- Could serve as a significant deterrent for calculated crimes
- A similar approach worked for loan shark harassment cases, which decreased significantly after mandatory caning was introduced in 2010
- Criminal lawyer Josephus Tan believes caning would have a deterrent effect on scam-related offenses
- Arguments against caning:
- Criminal lawyer Ramesh Tiwary questions its effectiveness, noting drug offenders reoffend despite caning
- Could be disproportionate for money mules with limited knowledge or involvement
- It would not affect women or men above 50 who cannot be caned (though they’d face increased jail terms)
- Alternative approaches:
- Education about legal consequences and financial literacy
- Providing legitimate employment opportunities
- Balancing deterrence with rehabilitation
The article presents perspectives from both sides of the debate while highlighting the profound impact of scams on victims in Singapore.
Clik here to view.

Analysis of Money Mule Cases, Scamming, and the Potential Effectiveness of Caning
Money Mule Operations and Scamming in Singapore
Based on the article, money mules serve as a critical link in the scamming ecosystem:
Clik here to view.

- Recruitment patterns: Mules are often recruited through online advertisements promising “fast cash” for sharing bank accounts or Singpass details
- Transaction volume: Some accounts handle millions in scam proceeds
- Increasing prevalence: Investigation numbers rose from 7,500 in 2021 to over 9,600 in 2023 (slight decrease to 8,000 in 2024)
- Legal changes: 2023 amendments to relevant laws made it easier to prosecute money mules, even those claiming ignorance of how their accounts were being used
Clik here to view.

Current Sentencing and Effectiveness
The current approach uses fines and imprisonment:
- Fines up to $250,000
- Jail terms up to 5 years
- Recent sentencing guidelines recommending minimum 6-month jail terms
Despite these measures, scam cases have continued to increase yearly since 2020, with total losses reaching $1.1 billion in 2024 alone.
Clik here to view.

Potential Effectiveness of Caning
The debate over caning’s effectiveness centers on several factors:
Arguments Supporting Effectiveness:
- Precedent from loan shark cases: After introducing mandatory caning for loan shark harassment in 2010, cases dropped from 11,776 (2011) to 3,336 (2020)
- Psychological deterrence: As MP Tan Wu Meng noted, money mule activity is “not a crime of passion” but instead calculated, suggesting punishment severity would factor into potential offenders’ risk calculations
- Symbolic message: Demonstrate the government’s seriousness about scam prevention
Clik here to view.

Arguments Against Effectiveness:
- Uneven application: Women and men over 50 cannot be caned (though they would face extended jail terms)
- Proportionality concerns: May be excessive for those with limited knowledge of their role
- Evidence from drug cases: Some offenders still reoffend after caning, questioning its deterrent effect
- Root causes unaddressed: Economic motivations driving people to become money mules might require different interventions
Clik here to view.

Broader Considerations
- Cost-benefit evaluation: Have existing sentencing guidelines been given sufficient time to demonstrate effectiveness before introducing more severe punishments?
- Alternative approaches: Education, financial literacy, and legitimate employment opportunities might address motivation rather than just deterrence
- Societal impact: Balancing punitive measures with rehabilitation opportunities
Clik here to view.

The effectiveness of caning would likely depend on:
- How it’s implemented (mandatory vs. discretionary)
- Which specific offenses it apply to (organizing vs. participating)
- How it’s publicized to potential offenders
- Whether it’s part of a comprehensive approach addressing various aspects of scam operations
The loan shark harassment precedent suggests caning could potentially reduce scam-related activities, but this would need to be measured against proportionality concerns and complemented with preventative measures addressing underlying motivations.
Charis Chan makes several compelling points about the ineffectiveness and ethical concerns of Singapore’s proposed caning punishment for scammers.
Caning As A Potentially Ineffective Form of Deterrence
Clik here to view.

Charis Chan argues that caning would be ineffective for several reasons:
- The potential financial rewards of scamming can outweigh the deterrent effect of physical punishment
- Caning doesn’t prevent group collaboration among scammers
- The punishment doesn’t address the recovery of stolen funds
- There are significant ethical concerns with inflicting physical harm as punishment
Clik here to view.

Alternative Solutions Proposed
Instead of physical punishment, Charis suggests more constructive approaches:
- Public awareness campaigns on large screens in Singapore’s urban areas
- Educational programs in schools and workplaces to teach scam prevention
- Establishing active hotlines for reporting and assistance
Clik here to view.

Additional Considerations
I’d add that education and awareness are indeed powerful tools against scamming. When people understand common tactics like urgency pressure, impersonation of authorities, or unusual payment requests, they become much less susceptible to these schemes.
Technology solutions could complement these educational efforts:
Clik here to view.

- AI-powered scam detection in banking and communication systems
- Secure verification processes for sensitive transactions
- Digital literacy programs specifically targeting vulnerable populations like seniors
The most effective approach would likely combine preventative education, technological safeguards, and appropriate legal consequences that focus on financial restitution rather than physical punishment.
Capital Punishment in Singapore
Clik here to view.

Singapore maintains one of the world’s strictest capital punishment systems, known for its mandatory death penalty provisions and relatively high execution rate relative to its population size.
Current Status and Application
Capital punishment in Singapore is primarily carried out by hanging and applies to several offences:
Clik here to view.

- Drug trafficking – Perhaps the most internationally known application, with mandatory death sentences for trafficking specificImage may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.quantities of controlled substances (e.g., 15+ grams of heroin, 500+ grams of cannabis)
- Murder – Intentional murder carries a mandatory death sentence
- Firearms offences – Unlawful discharge of firearms, even if no injury results
- Terrorism-related crimes – Certain acts causing deaths
- Kidnapping – In cases where the victim is harmed
Clik here to view.

Legal Framework and Recent Changes
Singapore amended its laws in 2012 to provide some limited discretion in drug trafficking cases. Judges may now impose life imprisonment instead of death if:
- The accused was only a courier and not involved in the supply/distribution
- The accused provided substantive assistance to authorities in disrupting drug trafficking activities
- The accused has a mental or intellectual disability that substantially impairs responsibility for actions
Clik here to view.

International and Domestic Perspectives
Singapore’s government maintains that capital punishment is a necessary deterrent for serious crimes, particularly drug trafficking. Officials often cite the country’s low crime rates as evidence of effectiveness.
Clik here to view.

However, the practice has faced significant international criticism from human rights organizations and some countries that oppose capital punishment on humanitarian grounds.
Domestically, public opinion polls generally show majority support for the death penalty, though activist groups continue to campaign for abolition or reforms.
Recent Trends
While Singapore continues to carry out executions, there have been some signs of modest reforms in recent years, including:
- The introduction of limited judicial discretion mentioned above
- Greater transparency around execution statistics
- More robust legal representation requirements for capital casesImage may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Maxthon
When it comes to staying safe online, using a secure and private browser is crucial. Such a browser can help protect your personal information and keep you safe from cyber threats. One option that offers these features is the Maxthon Browser, which is available for free. It comes with built-in Adblock and anti-tracking software to enhance your browsing privacy.
Maxthon Browser is dedicated to providing a secure and private browsing experience for its users. With a strong focus on privacy and security, Maxthon employs strict measures to safeguard user data and online activities from potential threats. The browser utilises advanced encryption protocols to ensure that user information remains protected during internet sessions.
Clik here to view.

In addition, Maxthon implements features such as ad blockers, anti-tracking tools, and incognito mode to enhance users’ privacy. By blocking unwanted ads and preventing tracking, the browser helps maintain a secure environment for online activities. Furthermore, incognito mode enables users to browse the web without leaving any trace of their history or activity on the device.
Maxthon’s commitment to prioritising the privacy and security of its users is exemplified through regular updates and security enhancements. These updates are designed to address emerging vulnerabilities and ensure that the browser maintains its reputation as a safe and reliable option for those seeking a private browsing experience. Overall, Maxthon Browser offers a comprehensive set of tools and features aimed at delivering a secure and private browsing experience.
Maxthon Browser, a free web browser, offers users a secure and private browsing experience with its built-in Adblock and anti-tracking software. These features help to protect users from intrusive ads and prevent websites from tracking their online activities. The browser’s Adblock functionality blocks annoying pop-ups and banners, allowing for an uninterrupted browsing session. Additionally, the anti-tracking software safeguards user privacy by preventing websites from collecting personal data without consent.
By utilising the Maxthon Browser, users can browse the internet confidently, knowing that their online activities are shielded from prying eyes. The integrated security features alleviate concerns about potential privacy breaches and ensure a safer browsing environment. Furthermore, the browser’s user-friendly interface makes it easy for individuals to customise their privacy settings according to their preferences.
Maxthon Browser not only delivers a seamless browsing experience but also prioritises the privacy and security of its users through its efficient ad-blocking and anti-tracking capabilities. With these protective measures in place, users can enjoy the internet while feeling reassured about their online privacy.
In addition, the desktop version of Maxthon Browser works seamlessly with their VPN, providing an extra layer of security. By using this browser, you can minimise the risk of encountering online threats and enjoy a safer internet experience. With its combination of security features, Maxthon Browser aims to provide users with peace of mind while they browse.
Maxthon Browser stands out as a reliable choice for users who prioritise privacy and security. With its robust encryption measures and extensive privacy settings, it offers a secure browsing experience that gives users peace of mind. The browser’s commitment to protecting user data and preventing unauthorised access sets it apart in the competitive market of web browsers.
The post Would caning serve as effective deterrence? appeared first on Maxthon | Privacy Private Browser.